NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing
FAQ Members List Calendar

NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing Post all your fresh water topics on this board

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2015, 12:19 PM
NJSquatch's Avatar
NJSquatch NJSquatch is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Da' Cong
Posts: 1,556
Default Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/new...e_proposal.htm

Crossbows for bowfishing?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2015, 01:55 PM
Delawareriver's Avatar
Delawareriver Delawareriver is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 622
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

Good deal, I helped get the the crossbow proposal in, they make an adapter for cross bow for the ams reel. In the past I've been asked to help with wounded warriors as well as other veterans and with the current regulations. if the guy couldn't shoot a bow or stand to shoot a bow over the light rail there wasn't any options for him. A cross bow is a disadvantage as it takes time to reload and recock it bit it at least gives guys an option to use.
__________________
~~~~Bloody Decks Bowfishing~~~~
Saving your gamefish one carp at a time!
Follow us on-
Instagram @bloody_decks_bowfishing
Facebook - team bloody decks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2015, 02:01 PM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Lebanon, nj
Posts: 4,488
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

bow fish up and eel and then i'll be impressed! haha i was just looking at the species available for bow fishing, an eel really...you would have to be an amazing shot i would assume.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2015, 02:05 PM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Lebanon, nj
Posts: 4,488
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

YES PLEASE! to this one:

PROPOSED REGULATION CHANGES FOR DELAWARE RIVER
Currently, New Jersey has no minimum size or creel limit for Channel Catfish on the Delaware River and Pennsylvania allows up to 50 to be harvested each day. The Council proposes a minimum size limit of 12 inches and a daily limit of 5 per day. These limits are consistent with current size and creel limits for Channel Catfish in all other fresh waters in New Jersey. The harsh winter of 2014-2015 resulted in extensive ice forming on the river from Trenton through the Delaware Water Gap. The extended ice cover and liberal regulations resulted in unprecedented numbers of Channel Catfish being harvested by anglers. The event emphasized the need for more stringent regulations.

The Council also proposes that species of fish in the Delaware River that do not have specific daily creel and possession limits shall have a daily creel and possession limit of 25 in total. This proposed change provides protection to species such as Pumpkinseed, Bluegill, Brown Bullhead, Rock Bass, and White Catfish that are routinely caught in the Delaware River. This proposed amendment protects these and other non-typical game species in New Jersey and is consistent with provisions already afforded these species in other waters of the state.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2015, 08:23 PM
Eskimo's Avatar
Eskimo Eskimo is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Basking Ridge, NJ
Posts: 1,489
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

.


Thanks for posting this NJSquatch. I am going to write them to voice my support for these changes.

I had no idea that catfish were basically treated worse than baitfish in terms sport-fishing regulations on the Delaware. If you think about how many hundreds of thousands of licensed anglers live within driving range of the main branch of the Delaware River, from NYC to Wilkes-Barre, PA - it makes sense to restore some order to the harvest of Channel Catfish.

As far as Snapping Turtles are concerned, I think the current and the proposed regulations are dangerously permissive. In my opinion, the Chinese do not have any right to our freshwater resources. I believe any commercial exploitation of the Snapping Turtles is selling-out OUR wildlife and outdoor heritage to the Chinese - and that's morally reprehensible and ecologically reckless.


.
__________________
"The fish you release may be a gift to another, as it may have been a gift to you." -Lee Wulf
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-2015, 08:33 PM
Esox Luciano Esox Luciano is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bergen County
Posts: 855
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskimo View Post
.
I believe any commercial exploitation of the Snapping Turtles is selling-out OUR wildlife and outdoor heritage to the Chinese - and that's morally reprehensible and ecologically reckless. .
I definitely agree with you on this one buddy. Very well put.
As for the new crossbow regs, I think it's ****in lame!! I'm all for creating better opportunities for the handicapped to get to/land some fish. I know a few people that would appreciate extra efforts to get some veterans and/or handicapped folks doing what they love. So fishing, being one of those things that if it was soo easy...everybody would do it, why make it easier for the people who suck. I personally witnessed a hunter make a chipmunk kabob from 40-50 yds out, and another missing every shot at still carp feeding from 15ft above off a bridge. Some people suck, some have skill and luck. Let's not get the difference confused and make it easier for those who don't need this physical/mechanical advantage!
__________________
You can't catch fish from ur couch.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2015, 10:30 AM
Skunk City's Avatar
Skunk City Skunk City is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nutley, NJ
Posts: 2,998
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisper4694 View Post
YES PLEASE! to this one:

PROPOSED REGULATION CHANGES FOR DELAWARE RIVER
Currently, New Jersey has no minimum size or creel limit for Channel Catfish on the Delaware River and Pennsylvania allows up to 50 to be harvested each day. The Council proposes a minimum size limit of 12 inches and a daily limit of 5 per day. These limits are consistent with current size and creel limits for Channel Catfish in all other fresh waters in New Jersey. The harsh winter of 2014-2015 resulted in extensive ice forming on the river from Trenton through the Delaware Water Gap. The extended ice cover and liberal regulations resulted in unprecedented numbers of Channel Catfish being harvested by anglers. The event emphasized the need for more stringent regulations.
This!!!! Those poor Channel Cats got absolutely SLAUGHTERED last winter on the D.
__________________

16' MirroCraft V-Hull
12.5' Perception Sport Sound
10' Pelican Pursuit
Clam Kenai Pro
Instagram: rjjasonek
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-08-2015, 02:32 PM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Lebanon, nj
Posts: 4,488
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

why anyone would want or need to keep more than (or even up to) 25 fish per person per day is way beyond my understanding...greedy and irresponsible are the only words that come to my mind.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-08-2015, 02:34 PM
UglyStick's Avatar
UglyStick UglyStick is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 602
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisper4694 View Post
why anyone would want or need to keep more than (or even up to) 25 fish per person per day is way beyond my understanding...greedy and irresponsible are the only words that come to my mind.
You must love reading some of the saltwater posts...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-08-2015, 09:26 PM
Chrisper4694's Avatar
Chrisper4694 Chrisper4694 is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Lebanon, nj
Posts: 4,488
Default Re: Proposed Fish Code Regulation Changes

I never freeze fish I'd rather cook it and bring it to work and give it away. I've heard you can vacuum seal freeze it and not tell the difference idk. To each their own I guess, just baffles me. I released a huge fluke this year and every saltwater fisherman I told looked at me like I had two heads. It's a whole different world.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.