What Scientific Authorities Have to Say About Whale Mortalities

[Broad Bill]

[QUOTE=Togfather2530;576876]I can’t believe this stupid political left right nonsense post is still up. Proves how dead this site has become. I see both sides of the picture and both the left wing and right wing so called diehards are nuts. The so-called conservative rights take handouts whenever they can for the most part (example, Covid relief money) and the Democrats on the left side are just totally nuts with their views. The other thing that makes me laugh is how the captains and people on this site bitch about the restrictions on the regulations. If these charter captains and half the people on the site had their way they would strip the ocean of all the fish they can like they did with the blues and weak fish back in the day. Please for God sakes remove this stupid thread.[/QUOTE

Pop up adds and views equal $ so topics that weren't tolerated for years in a fishing reports only forum appear to be welcome now. Site is turning into the "View" with Blind Squirrel playing Joy Behar.

[Duffman]

Post has been up 16 days.

111 replies.


4,260 views.

And you want it shut down? LMAO. C’mon man. This is revenue gold!!!

[Blind Squirrel]

Originally Posted by tautog

Wait isn't this ad hominem....or does that only apply to me.

tautog: "Everyone quote[d] in your article [https://www.sierraclub.org/new-jerse...le-mortalities] is involved in the offshore wind industry. Hardly an unbiased source given their salary is dependent on the success of these wind farms."

Me: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

Quoted in my article:
—The Sierra Club NJ Chapter
—NOAA
—The Marine Mammal Commission
—The Rutgers University Offshore Wind Energy Collaborative
—The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
—The New York Times
—The Intercept

In my reply that you claim is or may be ad hominem, along with another one immediately following it, I provided 3 links to show the close connections between the author of an article and the fossil fuel industry.

[togzilla]

"Pop up adds and views equal $ so topics that weren't tolerated for years in a fishing reports only forum appear to be welcome now. Site is turning into the "View" with Blind Squirrel playing Joy Behar."

Now that is hysterical. I'm starting to believe "Blind Idiot" is bot.

[Blind Squirrel]

Originally Posted by togzilla

"Pop up adds and views equal $ so topics that weren't tolerated for years in a fishing reports only forum appear to be welcome now. Site is turning into the "View" with Blind Squirrel playing Joy Behar."

Now that is hysterical. I'm starting to believe "Blind Idiot" is bot.

There seem to be a lot of blind idiots on this thread.

[AndyS]

Originally Posted by Blind Squirrel

There seem to be a lot of blind idiots on this thread.

If I type in bold, does that mean I am correct ?

[hammer4reel]

Originally Posted by Blind Squirrel

There seem to be a lot of blind idiots on this thread.

Maybe just one that already knew it when he picked his user name here .

Betting your one of those guys that goes to sleep at night , wakes up to 6 “ of snow , and claims it didn’t happen that night because he didn’t see it .

It’s ALMOST funny you think the speed limit for boats over 35 ‘ is ok and that it will actually save whales .

Yet when the ABSOLUTE worst way to generate electricity is killing them you show a blind eye .

.

[Blind Squirrel]

Originally Posted by hammer4reel

Maybe just one that already knew it when he picked his user name here .
Betting your one of those guys that goes to sleep at night , wakes up to 6 “ of snow , and claims it didn’t happen that night because he didn’t see it .
It’s ALMOST funny you think the speed limit for boats over 35 ‘ is ok and that it will actually save whales .
Yet when the ABSOLUTE worst way to generate electricity is killing them you show a blind eye .
.

NOAA scientists think "the speed limit for boats over 35‘ is ok and that it will actually save whales." You think wind energy is "the ABSOLUTE worst way to generate electricity" and is killing whales. I believe the science & evidence.

[Blind Squirrel]

Originally Posted by AndyS

If I type in bold, does that mean I am correct ?

...correct about what?

[tautog]

Originally Posted by Blind Squirrel

tautog: "Everyone quote[d] in your article [https://www.sierraclub.org/new-jerse...le-mortalities] is involved in the offshore wind industry. Hardly an unbiased source given their salary is dependent on the success of these wind farms."

Me: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

Quoted in my article:
—The Sierra Club NJ Chapter
—NOAA
—The Marine Mammal Commission
—The Rutgers University Offshore Wind Energy Collaborative
—The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
—The New York Times
—The Intercept

In my reply that you claim is or may be ad hominem, along with another one immediately following it, I provided 3 links to show the close connections between the author of an article and the fossil fuel industry.

Those are all organizations with close ties to the wind industry. So your point is moot. Which of those groups or news organizations is anti offshore wind or neutral on offshore wind?