![]() |
|
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
![]() | ||
|
|||||||
| NJFishing.com Fisheries Management/Regulations This board is closed for posting but will serve as an archieve for all Fisheries Management and Regulations posts from other boards. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
If a politician does not support something and believes the bulk of his/her constituency will agree (or at least a majority of those that vote will agree) then he or she has no reason to change their position. Once a politician realizes that their position is an unpopular one they either change their position or lose their seat of power. There is most certainly an in-between. If there ever was an area of life that was NOT black and white it would be politics. I am surprised you did not know that. Money is often the driving force in politics not because it is money, but because money gives the ability to gain votes. Not so much with buying votes (although I've no doubt that happens too) but with the ability to campaign and out do the other guy/girl. If group "A" gives money to a politician they will expect their policies/positions to be supported by that politician. In return group "A" will get their members/supporters to support that politician. If group "B" has more members/supporters and they make it known to the politician that he/she will lose those votes if they do not support group "B's" position that is about the only way you can override the money/votes/support of group "A." This is basic politics, I am surprised you don't understand this. Quote:
The first Rally was designed to get political support for certain positions and translate them into legislation. That happened, especially as evidenced by the expansion of legislation introduced AFTER the first rally aimed at specific issues in fisheries. The second rally sought to increase the level of legislative support so as to move that legislation towards adoption. This also happened, at least to some degree, as evidenced by the increased legislators that came out publicly in favor of those pieces of legislation. By having fewer people in attendance it hurts the ability to convince even more legislators that this is what the millions (or a large part of the millions) of anglers in the US wants. That is how poor attendance can subvert the goals of a rally such as the one that took place yesterday. Quote:
You ignore (or conveniently forgot to mention) the closures that were stopped, the fisheries that were kept open (but were threatened with further restrictions or closures) etc. I have yet to meet the person or group that wins 100% of what they want 100% of the time. Let me know when you find that group or person. Quote:
Quote:
You are not there to listen to them, you are there to make sure that they have been listening to us.
__________________
CaptTB 125' Jamaica - Big Jamaica.com 100' Paramount - The "Wreckmasters" Save The Summer Flounder Fishery Fund United Boatmen NJOA.org RFA-NJ.org Last edited by CaptTB; 03-22-2012 at 07:22 PM.. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you Capt TB, Dave A and the others that made this possible. I too was disappointed with the fishermanturnout especially from our area but surprised as hell to see how many more of the politicians were there to support us compared to 2 years ago. I will continue to support our rights to the oceans, and do whats necessary to keep us, our children, and grandchildren doing something that we all love and our god given right. Thanks again to all that made this event happen and to those who made it to this event.
__________________
I Fish, I Vote, I Marched!! Proud Supporter of SSFFF |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|