NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


Your Predictions on the Future of Fishing in NJ - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing
FAQ Members List Calendar

NJFishing.com Fresh Water Fishing Post all your fresh water topics on this board

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-02-2015, 12:40 PM
Bruce Litton Bruce Litton is offline
NJFishing.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bedminster, New Jersey
Posts: 587
Default Re: Your Predictions on the Future of Fishing in NJ

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave B. View Post
Stony Brook has suffered the same fate as Neshanic (Creek)River. Far too much development in the watershed that both draws down the aquifers via individual wells and also prevents aquifer replenishment due to impermeable surfaces, i.e. roads, driveways, sidewalks, roofs, etc.

I used to fish both streams a great deal when I was young. Stony had a good to great smallie pop and Neshanic had a tremendous smallie pop. My first time fishing with my Dad was in the Neshanic in 1963. Spent a LOT of my youth wet wading many miles of that crick. Now it dries up most summers. The last time I fished it was about 10 years ago. I found LMB, bullheads and a few chubs. Not a single smallie despite hitting areas from Amwell Rd to Manners Rd, along Welisewitz and on down to Rainbow Hill and Black Pt/Montgomery. Extemely disappointing to put it quite mildly.

The lower SBR has some degree of protection from such a fate due to its role in the NJWSA system. As long as they need to use Spruce Run and RVR to maintain the mainstem flows the lower SBR will be fairly safe.

Thanks in great depth to the work of folks like Andy and the CJST both branches and the mainstem have a good fighting chance to survive as strong, viable fisheries.
Yeah, my brother Rick remarked that he noticed the times he hit Stony these years ago, the water level was peculiarly low & I recognized it had seemed so. That stuck in mind, but I had no explanation for it, which you've given, clearly. Wow, what a hit the Brook has taken. I fished it two consecutive days in 1977 for a total of 71 smallmouths over nine inches, all released, but I only numbered the legal sized. Other days had high figures, too, and the pressure the very few of us put on the stream never flagged the catches.

I'm hearing some good things about the Raritan system, so maybe my concerns just echo from the death of favored home water. The work Andy does is no short of amazing. We have good watershed associations. There's real concern for the system...
Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.