NJ Fishing Advertise Here at New Jersey's Number 1 Fishing Website!


Message Board


Regulation vs. Legislation - NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey


Message Board Registration       FAQ

Go Back   NJFishing.com Your Best Online Source for Fishing Information in New Jersey > NJFishing.com Fisheries Management/Regulations
FAQ Members List Calendar

NJFishing.com Fisheries Management/Regulations This board is closed for posting but will serve as an archieve for all Fisheries Management and Regulations posts from other boards.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2011, 02:39 PM
CaptTB CaptTB is offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default Regulation vs. Legislation

It was recently announced that a "Hastily Conceived" and "Amateurish" bill siting on the governor's desk may "take up to a year" to come to fruition, yadda yadda yadda.

For those that do not know, unlike many states NJ is one where ALL of our Saltwater regulations are done as a regulation, administratively through bodies like the NJMFC.

The one notable exception to that is striped bass regs. In order to help create the gamefish status that striped bass currently have in this state, legislating their management was deemed necessary by the groups fighting for that designation at the time.

Unfortunately, as was witnessed just a few years ago, NJ can be found out of compliance with federal management bodies and the federal commerce department if it doe not change its regs to match the FMP in place for a given fishery. With Stripers, it took an act of the NJ congress to make the last change to striper regs, barely avoiding a total shutdown of our fishery simply because congress takes forever to act.

Hence, all regs are done in a manner that is not at the whim of the political circus, knows no party lines and is part of the public process to boot.

It has been suggested that this route for the registry may delay its implementation. This is certainly possible.

But I ask this question:

Had the group that made this recent announcement and the groups on its board that ACTIVELY LOBBIED AGAINST THE LEGISLATION IN QUESTION for the past YEAR actually supported it, might we have had all last year to go through the regulation process??

Think about this folks. Groups like the federation and JCAA signed in to a senate hearing OVER ONE YEAR AGO on this bill as being OPPOSED to it, and NJOA has NEVER PUBLICLY SUPPORTED this legislation. It took nearly a YEAR to finally get the bill out for a vote, which then passed UNANIMOUSLY out of TWO senate committees AND IN THE SENATE and passed AGAIN in the assembly.

Obviously this bill was written to MOVE, with WIDESPREAD BI-PARTISAN SUPPORT FROM BOTH HOUSES OF GOVERNMENT.

How fast would it have passed A YEAR AGO if we had had the groundswell of support from all of those groups like we did from individuals recently?

Might we have had all or most of 2010 to go through the rest of the process???

Food for thought.
  #2  
Old 01-15-2011, 04:35 PM
AndyS's Avatar
AndyS AndyS is offline
NJFishing.com Old Salt
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10,599
Question Re: Regulation vs. Legislation

Is this about fishing......??
  #3  
Old 01-15-2011, 05:55 PM
CaptTB CaptTB is offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,074
Default Re: Regulation vs. Legislation

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyS
Is this about fishing......??
It directly relates to fisheries management and the registry bill as well as a press release on said bill. Were you not around when it was posted by Gerry that fisheries issues will be posted here and then moved to the management forum once they have finished being posted in? That's why you cannot post in the fisheries management forum.
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.