Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerry Zagorski
When I said you didn’t get it I did not mean your opinion, I’m talking about the manner and tone in which you present them. I know this comes from your passion but in my opinion, your opinions might be better received by others if they were a bit less confrontational. But hey, that's my opinion and we're all built differently...
|
Gerry thanks for your reply. I'll be the first to admit I post with conviction and I don't sugarcoat my comments. I've spent 7-8 years and thousands of hours researching and communicating with state and federal agencies including ASMFC and MAFMC. I went through all the proper channels and in the end got
ZERO support from RFA, SSFFF, JCAA and the ASA when politics was brought into it. Everyone has their own agendas and nothing will change with fisheries management because collectively we're focused on the wrong issues and no one has any balls to challenge NMFS.
I actually made more progress with leadership and recreational fishing groups in New York than our own state including New York state representatives until my work was intercepted and sabotaged by a sponsor from this site who if he reads this knows who I'm referring to. Read the attached article on page 15 submitted in 2019 from the
New York Recreational and For-Hire Fishing Alliance by a good friend Steve Cannizzo signed by other NY FV operators. I wish I experienced the same support from my own state's fishing organizations.
https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...ts+10-4-19.pdf
Also read the full analysis submitted to the Commission and the Council regarding the status of the stock.
https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...ber+19+Mtg.pdf
The sponsor I’m referring to called one of my contacts, intercepted a piece I was working on for a State Representative and ripped him a new ******* for supporting my work. For the record, it wasn't Capt. Ron who has done more than his share fighting for our collective recreational rights. A sponsor whose livelihood depends on sustainable fisheries goes behind my back and sabotages my work. The same person who asked me to prepare multiple power point presentations, write memorandums and research reports and attend an NMFS function which was later cancelled for political reasons trashes my work behind my back because it didn't support his personal or club’s agenda. Precisely why the recreational sector will never organize and eventually small businesses and party and charter boat operator’s dependent on these resources will fade into obscurity because everyone has their own motivations, none of which include the ultimate health of these stocks.
So when I post comments I write them with passion and conviction. If it offends anyone, lose the thin skin because if we collectively don’t start bringing heat there won’t be any fisheries left for future generations. Gerry, you’ve mentioned a number of times you want your grandchild / grandchildren to enjoy the fishery as we have and the generations before us. If we continue kicking the can down the street and don’t start addressing the issues corrupting fisheries management, you’d be better served having your grandkids take up golf or tennis as these fisheries one by one will disappear. I’d be less concerned with my approach and tone and more concerned with the content of my posts.
Its why I commented about a certain individual a few weeks ago. He’s part of a flawed process that’s delivered brutal results under his watch. Name one thing he’s done for the striper or fluke stocks that’s positive to the recreational sector or the fishery itself. I’ll be the first to applaud talent, positive performance and results but it needs to be earned. I don’t see any of those attributes in this individual, just my opinion supported by drastic reductions in each of these two fisheries.
For 5 or more years I’ve predicted a collapse in this fishery due to the way it’s being managed. I believe a 42% decrease in assignable quota for ’24 and ’25 represents the beginning of that collapse and it will continue for the same reasons I’ve stated. Not one person or state or federal agency has said my analysis or conclusions are wrong, they simply refuse to admit their decisions over the past two decades have been.
I’ve tried to educate members on this site for everyone’s benefit but clearly few want to hear it so I’ll refrain from further comments. Just remember when seasons get closed and possession limits go to one, remember each of you had a choice and your choice was status quo and to accept the crumbs the recreational sector has been given every year. We’re actually at a point where crumbs would be an improvement based on the regulations being forced on us.
If we ever get to a point where a decision is made and funding secured to sue the federal government for violations of MSA, I'd be happy to assist in that litigation. Until then, I'm simply wasting my time and the site's time as most here could really give a shit about the future and are only concerned about today which in my opinion is what NMFS wants and is assuredly a formula for failure.
