Quote:
Originally Posted by dales529
i think we agree on more than less.
My statement that it was a small sampling on public comment was intended!
RFA-NJ and SSFFF have that same ear within F&G but also realize that the options come from federal (where RFA National has more ears). The lobbyist we at RFA-NJ Hired is from within that system both F&G and DEP on NJ State level so we get it and keep trying.
I always profess that anyone or any group through any means possible keep at it and don't really care where the change comes from or who gets the "credit" as long as it happens so please keep up the good work. Just trying to do the same within the means that I believe can help. Thats also why I work with Tom Dakota on his analysis, and anyone anywhere who would like to make a difference. Unfortunately it also needs fundraising to specifically target the politics when needed.
Why do you suspect F&G hands were tied this year? States only have so much power and while a slot fish vs shorten season may not be playing out within F&G there is nothing at the federal level that YET allows for it until it does. MRIP is the culprit there.
I hope the numbers and base you refer to have a platform as there have been many spin off social media groups to support your statement. It just hasn't translated into actual change just like the rest of the groups. I suspect they are finding out that its not so easy!
You are welcome if you want to fish with us Sept 14
|
The fishery management from NMFS is a given guideline it is not absolute .
Each state can offer its own management plan as long as it fits the overall guidelines and NMFS signs off that it meets their quota .
.
That’s why each surrounding state has different bag limits and seasons .
.
I was told that info needed to give the state a different option took longer due to them wanting to prepare a solid basis for change .
I know they also now have Dakotas info on hand that hopefully bolsters their case .
