Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfish715
I agree. That's about what I thought the length would be. The girth factor certainly has to be considered, but at 17+ pounds, we are in unchartered waters for any legitimate comparison. I will say this about the girth of some of the sub-legal fluke that we were releasing this year, "They were thick". Even the 16" fluke were fat enough to have made a substantial meal for someone. Two or three of them would have been a generous fresh dinner for a family of four.
If a fisherman was waiting to catch two keepers of 18" for his family, they would be heading to a a burger joint for one of their "dinners" instead of a freshly caught meal from the sea. Which would you prefer? As a family provider, I would rather bring home fillets from three, fat 16" fluke for my family to eat than to head to a fast food place in order to treat them.
|
The fish you describe are the perfect size for eating. Lot of people working on getting a slot adopted and trying to convince marine fisheries the regulations in place in the 90's (14" and 15" recreationally) which led to tremendous growth in the stock need to be gradually phased back in for the fishery to correct itself. No easy task but the effort to accomplish that continues.