Quote:
Originally Posted by penn50w
Unless I'm reading this wrong - why wouldn't we opt for C3, 1 fish @ 28" - 35" & 1 fish @ over 35" not having to throw back the 34 1/16" -35 7/8" fish? Would be like NY but 35" instead of 40". Yes, no ?
|
I have to agree with this I am not a lawyer but the way I read we have all of these choices.
A status quo
B1-9
C1-3
D1
Problem with status quo is it would mean greater cut backs in following year or two.
Just my translation.
