Done and thanks for bringing this to our attention Dave.
These Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are very popular out in California and it was only a matter of time before they tried doing it here in the east. For those of you who are not familiar with MPAs, if an area is made an MPA you are not allowed to fish that area.
It's Stellwagon now, what if it were Sandy Hook or Shrewsbury Rocks??
Please take the time to do this and for those of you who do not have Word you can copy and past the text below and email it to
tnies@nefmc.org
I would also ask that you considering sharing this on your Facebook page by going up to the very top of the page and clicking on the Blue F button.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Tom Nies
New England Fishery Management Council
50 Water Street
Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950
Fax: 978-465-3116
Proposed Stellwagen Bank Sanctuary Ecological Research Area (DHRA)
Dear Mr. Nies:
I am writing to you as a recreational angler regarding the proposed habitat protection measures being considered by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC), I strongly oppose any changes to the Western Gulf of Maine closed area and strongly support No Action.
In the past few years since the introduction of catch shares, we have been forced to run further offshore to locate ground fish with the high costs of marine fuel. I do not feel it is justified to deny public access in a 55 square NM area from recreational anglers forcing them fish further offshore in small boats. The waters located in the SBNMS have been fished by recreational anglers for decades. Recreational anglers do not harm the bottom fishing with hook and line. Currently most recreational anglers are fishing for ground fish for only six months because of the prohibition on cod from Nov – mid April.
The recreational sector always seems to be left out of focus when it comes to spotlighting NEFMC issues and initiatives; in reality, the socioeconomic importance of recreational fishing cannot be ignored in this critically important vote. I strongly support No Action, and ask that the NEFMC recognize the significance of our recreational fishing industry and the socioeconomic impact this will place on the recreational fisherman and charter/party boat owners.
Any additional closed areas for the charter/party and recreational anglers will create an adverse effect on a sector that is already operating under rules with strict bag limits, minimum size limits, a hard TAC and a five-and-a-half month closed season on GOM cod. The fish that we do extract are used for personal consumption for meals at home and also are part of the allocation recommended by the NEFMC and approved by the NMFS. This proposed closure clearly does not justify the future socioeconomic impact on the recreational fishing sector. Charter customers and recreational fisherman spend millions of dollars to go fishing supporting many local businesses, from tackle shops charter and party boats, restaurants and hotels which will all be affected by being denied access.
Respectfully signed, Date: ________________
(sign name)_____________________________________________ __________
(print name) __________________________________________________ ____
(address, city, state)____________________________________________ ____
