![]() |
New Mako Regs ?
So what are the regs for 2018? Did they really up the size to 83 inches? if so that's a big fish
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
Yes to both comments
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
That's batshit. People fish 20 yrs and dont hook makos that big. That's a #350 fish. Who wants to deal with that, kill that or eat something that old?
Give me a barely legal to #180ish and fire up the grill! This will do significant damage to the northeast tourney circuit. And put tremendous pressure on already pressured shallow water threshers. |
Re: New Mako Regs ?
Quote:
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
Why yes, I have. This shouldn't impact recreational anglers. It should directly impact longliners, their gear and methodologies. I think it's stupid and short sighted. You can't keep 1 sexually immature mako but you can kill a ripe #350+ female? Wanna save em? Slot them. Shorten the harvest season.
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
Just going to throw this out there.. Not trying to stir the pot but i think all shark fish should be catch and release. And yes i have eaten Mako and Thresher and i know its good.
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
Quote:
No pot stirred but we all know we get bent over a barrel every year as recs bc of the huge impact commercial netting and longlining has on regional seasonal biomass. |
Re: New Mako Regs ?
Quote:
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
The best part is the commercial regs on long liners....if the shark is alive they have to release it...yeah right. I can see that happening.
|
Re: New Mako Regs ?
more like 240# we only kept 6' or bigger so not to big of a deal
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.