Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

The RFA does not have 1% of the resources of the NRA. You have to pay to play.

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

Maybe we all need to put up or............you all know the rest.
Apparently our phone calls and occasional e-mails to legislators need more ooomph.
I'm an NRA member. Thinking about joining RFA as well. Am I wasting my money ??
Maybe our heirs will get some benefit. http://joinrfa.org/

Tight lines all.
Tom K.

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

Kirk, you are an avid angler and I know from reading your posts you respect the sport. I also get your intention. Having said that the NRA has ONE and ONLY one Agenda. Anything that has the word Gun in it gets support whereas with Fishing regulation, some are on board with fighting (donation wise) ONLY Stripers while others favor ONLY Fluke while others favor ONLY Seabass
or some favor 2 out of the 3 While still others believe because the RFA is NOT NRA that nothing can be done so they do NOTHING at all. Then factor in that there are other fishing rights groups that some support rather than support ALL fishing groups which creates more separation and less "pay to play" so comparing NRA to RFA is not really a true comparison. Anyway you get my point. There really is NO reason given the amount of fisherman nation wide that the RFA couldn't compete lobbywise with the NRA except for the fishermen themselves while constantly informed stay on the sidelines

Other tidbits:

NRA spends approx 3 to 3.5 million in lobbying wheras the RFA spends between 70 to 250 thousand lobbying depending on issue and year so its more like RFA has between 2% to 7% of NRA spending not less than 1% but still a significant number. RFA has the lobby capability just NOT the support of its fishing community like NRA has from gun community. Just wish fishermen would realize that and give us a fight we could win

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

Thanks for that input Dale. I will join RFA tonite.

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

Yes I have..... I was one of the first members.

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

Now this is what I am talking about!

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

What exactly are you talking about? Is there an idea to make things better?

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

Thanks Tom it all helps! starts with one becomes a few then can become a movement

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

So let's see. I have to write a complete game plan? A doctrine.... a manifesto? Isn't that what you pay the organization that you belong too to do? I said what I had to say in my original post on this thread. Let the big minds over at XYZ take it from there if they like. After all they collect a lot of $$ ever year! I personally am concerned about the sport we love and that's way I made a statement on what I think can work. That's it! Good luck !!

Re: Blueline Regs Worst Than First Thought
 

NRA has more resources than just lobbying money. Their 501C spends more than $25 million per election cycle supporting 60-80 candidates. They spend $1 million a year in direct campaign contributions. The individual members spend several million per year in campaign contributions. They have a TV show and a magazine. Practically everyone knows them and very few people outside fishing have heard of the RFA. So very conservatively they are spending $19 million per year to push their agenda.