hartattack
05-22-2017, 07:12 AM
http://www.asmfc.org/files/Meetings/SFLScBSB_BoardConfCallSuppMaterials_May22_2017.pdf
From above link ^^^ " In summary, the TC noted that in the standard comparison of harvest, the NJ proposal was not conservationally equivalent to the Addendum XXVIII measures. It is important to understand that this standard is a component of the Summer Flounder FMP as the recreational fishery performance is evaluated against the RHL. When examining the new and separate comparison of total recreational fishing removals (harvest and
discard mortality in total), there was too much uncertainty to determine equivalency between the NJ proposal and the Addendum XXVIII measures due to unquantifiable reductions in discard mortality in the proposal and the unaccounted for discards during the closed seasons. Therefore, this work on total recreational fishing removals needs additional refinement before a determination can be made. "
Webinar today at 12:30 to discuss: http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/591cbab3pr23SFlounderScupBSBBoardConfCall_NJpropos al.pdf
What a fine mess we are in. However there is some optimism as Angler Paul pointed out on Friday:
" The NJMFC sets the regulations and they become law as soon as the DEP Commission signs them. He has now done so and it is the law. The season will open on 5/25. It will not matter if the ASMFC rules against us on Monday because NMFS has assured our State that they will not shut down our fishery. As far as federal water go, you must abide by the regulations of the State whose waters you are in when heading back to port. Paul Haertel JCAA board member/Past President "
Stay tuned for another chapter in this socio-economic soap opera :rolleyes:
From above link ^^^ " In summary, the TC noted that in the standard comparison of harvest, the NJ proposal was not conservationally equivalent to the Addendum XXVIII measures. It is important to understand that this standard is a component of the Summer Flounder FMP as the recreational fishery performance is evaluated against the RHL. When examining the new and separate comparison of total recreational fishing removals (harvest and
discard mortality in total), there was too much uncertainty to determine equivalency between the NJ proposal and the Addendum XXVIII measures due to unquantifiable reductions in discard mortality in the proposal and the unaccounted for discards during the closed seasons. Therefore, this work on total recreational fishing removals needs additional refinement before a determination can be made. "
Webinar today at 12:30 to discuss: http://www.asmfc.org/uploads/file/591cbab3pr23SFlounderScupBSBBoardConfCall_NJpropos al.pdf
What a fine mess we are in. However there is some optimism as Angler Paul pointed out on Friday:
" The NJMFC sets the regulations and they become law as soon as the DEP Commission signs them. He has now done so and it is the law. The season will open on 5/25. It will not matter if the ASMFC rules against us on Monday because NMFS has assured our State that they will not shut down our fishery. As far as federal water go, you must abide by the regulations of the State whose waters you are in when heading back to port. Paul Haertel JCAA board member/Past President "
Stay tuned for another chapter in this socio-economic soap opera :rolleyes: