PDA

View Full Version : Fluke survey on hook size from fish and game.


tuna john
11-20-2017, 07:54 PM
Usually I have no issues filling these out sending letters and email, but lately I feel just a waste of time. The last survey from them really helped us out a lot.


During the 2017 summer flounder season, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) conducted a promotion "If You Can't Keep It, Save It!" to encourage the use of proper methods and gear aimed at reducing unintentional mortalities that can occur when summer flounder are returned to the water. As part of this promotion, the NJDEP's Division of Fish and Wildlife distributed size 5/0 to 7/0 hooks to anglers through local New Jersey bait and tackle shops. They also shared information through several media outlets on best practices for reducing discard mortality. The objective of the promotion focused on conserving the species, improving anglers' overall fishing experience, and boosting New Jersey's recreational fishing economy. The information you provide in this survey will help assess if and how the promotion is working, as well as identify areas for improvement.

We strongly urge you to complete the survey as thoroughly and accurately as possible within the next 7 days. The survey should only take about 10 minutes to complete. Your participation in this survey is voluntary and your identity throughout remains anonymous. Nowhere is your name or email requested or captured. Your cooperation, however, is much-needed to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the results. Please know that your answers will be kept confidential.

PortlyRedhead
11-20-2017, 09:54 PM
Your post, like the email, failed to include a link.

Billfish715
11-20-2017, 10:50 PM
Try this. The first email from DEP came with no link.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/QHZHBS6

TerriMc223
11-21-2017, 05:33 AM
I took the survey. It was easy enough. I do appreciate the effort to promote safe release and conservation.

slammer
11-21-2017, 10:12 AM
Done

tuna john
11-21-2017, 11:27 AM
Your post, like the email, failed to include a link.

my intention was not to put the link in, but to merely state the fact I think its a waste of time. The email I have does have a link but great point thanks

togzilla
11-21-2017, 01:02 PM
Done

Detour66
11-21-2017, 02:13 PM
How about a survey of fish size that we can keep instead of worrying about gut hooking a fish!

NoLimit
11-21-2017, 05:55 PM
I'm not sure where they think hooks are a mortality issue. The mortality issue is BY CATCH on COMMERCIAL BOATS http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/photos/oceans/2014/GP0STO55A.jpg

AndyS
11-21-2017, 06:31 PM
Commercial boats take tonnage, F&G is worried about your safe C&R, great !!

Billfish715
11-21-2017, 11:35 PM
This survey is an attempt to support someone's theory that using larger hooks will save more fish by decreasing mortality. My comments were directed toward reducing the size limits so those deeply hooked 17 inch fish would not be wasted. My other suggestion was to increase the hook sizes even more, to 10/0 so no fish are ever deeply hooked or caught thereby reducing mortality by 100%. No fish caught means no dead fish. Problem solved.

dakota560
11-22-2017, 06:47 AM
Keep in mind during the late eighties into the nineties before bucktailing was as popular as it is today the majority of recreational guys dragged bait along with the entire party boat fleet, we didn't have an issue with the fluke biomass. Almost everyone was using English style hooks back then, spearing. squid. killies and strip baits. There were a lot more gut hooked fish and fish harvested in general with the more liberal possession limits and the stock biomass was soaring higher. Same time the possession limits were 8 - 10 at 13 - 14 inches. As previously posted, spawning stock biomass went from ~7,000 metric tons in '89 to over 50,000 metric tons in '12. An insane increase. If the explosion of the biomass continued even at more modest rate, it's incomprehensible how large the stock would be today. Would be somewhere over 300,000 metric tons today without considering other factors.

While it makes sense larger hooks will reduce some degree of mortality, that number won't come close to compensating for the carnage commercial dragging is causing the fluke population this time of year when the stock is in full spawn. Doesn't take a politician or scientist to predict the impact constant dragging has on stressing fish out, killing fish before they've had a chance to spawn and killing eggs once released. These fish are in the most highly concentrated schools this time of year and are being pounded at their most vulnerable time of year and important time of their life cycle. NMFS and ASMFC have their heads in the sand allowing this and no amount of reduced mortality from larger hooks for recreational anglers will remotely compensate for the devastation the winter commercial fishery is causing. A winter fishery never existed years ago, recruitment strength was at all time highs and the biomass skyrocketed to historic highs.

We don't need scientists to state the obvious, we need someone in Washington to put the health of this fishery before their own personal agendas or their failed methodology of managing catch as opposed to addressing the cause of the problem. It's all about harvesting too many breeders (15 - 20 years of size limit increases) and the build up of a commercial winter fishery to supply domestic and world markets. That's killing the fishery, not hook size. While I applaud NJ for trying, it doesn't address the problem killing the fishery.

Gerry Zagorski
11-22-2017, 07:32 AM
I completed the survey and applaud the NJ F&G for educating the public on this issue. Their hands are tied just like ours by what is handed down by the federal laws, management system resulting in our quotas. Rather then sit back and watch, they are at least trying to effect what they can.

Yes, there are much larger issues at hand here but we should all be doing our part to try and conserve the resources we are given and improving release mortality is one way to do that.

hammer4reel
11-22-2017, 08:29 AM
I filled it out , but IMO it was just as much a survey about how much revenue they are possibly losing.
Number in household , amount of income as well as amount of trips change has nothing to do with mortality .

If anything more than just hook size , how about proper handling shorts.
Video just put out of a sponsor boat here throwing back shorts like they were trash , claiming they were throwing back 90% of the fish caught daily.
And tossing them thirty feet through the air"

Ry609
11-22-2017, 09:36 AM
This survey is an attempt to support someone's theory that using larger hooks will save more fish by decreasing mortality. My comments were directed toward reducing the size limits so those deeply hooked 17 inch fish would not be wasted. My other suggestion was to increase the hook sizes even more, to 10/0 so no fish are ever deeply hooked or caught thereby reducing mortality by 100%. No fish caught means no dead fish. Problem solved.

My comments at the end were similar...introduce a slot fish limit of 4 @ 15-17" and 1 @ 21" and over or something similar...this decreases the amount of breeding females taken out of the population, albeit it just by recreational guys like us. I said that I was forced to throw back countless 15" to 17" THICK fish that I would've been satisfied keeping for dinner, and stopped fishing for the day rather than continue targeting larger breeding females. Also said that I noticed a significant uptick in numbers of fish caught once the commercial guys' season ended and were no longer dragging bottom taking or killing everything in their way. Won't make a difference I'm sure, but my conscience is clear and I said my piece!

I give credit to NJDEP for at least attempting to gather some data in our favor...it's not them that the fight is with.

NoLimit
11-22-2017, 11:05 AM
My comments at the end were similar...introduce a slot fish limit of 4 @ 15-17" and 1 @ 21" and over or something similar...this decreases the amount of breeding females taken out of the population, albeit it just by recreational guys like us. I said that I was forced to throw back countless 15" to 17" THICK fish that I would've been satisfied keeping for dinner, and stopped fishing for the day rather than continue targeting larger breeding females. Also said that I noticed a significant uptick in numbers of fish caught once the commercial guys' season ended and were no longer dragging bottom taking or killing everything in their way. Won't make a difference I'm sure, but my conscience is clear and I said my piece!

I give credit to NJDEP for at least attempting to gather some data in our favor...it's not them that the fight is with. Quoting this in the hopes that someone from the govt is reading this.

tuna john
11-23-2017, 02:38 PM
I think that most who receive/reply to the survey already promote proper catch and release etc. What they should do is educate the new people and tourist party boat patrons and or supply this hooks to 4 hour boats patrons as they are unlikely to know a bite. Telling us makes no sense as we already do it ....

tjd24
11-23-2017, 08:29 PM
I filled it out , but IMO it was just as much a survey about how much revenue they are possibly losing.
Number in household , amount of income as well as amount of trips change has nothing to do with mortality .

If anything more than just hook size , how about proper handling shorts.
Video just put out of a sponsor boat here throwing back shorts like they were trash , claiming they were throwing back 90% of the fish caught daily.
And tossing them thirty feet through the air"

I completed survey but left Household, Income, Race, etc boxes blank. They don't need that info.